June03, 2017 (C) Ravinder Singh progressindia2015@gmail.com
Most of our leaders said in an opportunity of such challenges lies greater opportunity of unemployed and underemployed youth to big business in case the undermentioned challenges are properly planned and systematically hlped to build support companies cluster to weed out carbon and bring grenn technology in palce. Nksagar commented .
Gregarious eloquence at its best let down India everywhere but this time it was Washington – US President in rejecting Paris Agreement was most CRITICAL of India who wanted $100b to $450b annually to Clean Up Dirty Plants and invest in Green Energy Program.
IPR issues may be next on US President’s Agenda.
I was extremely Critical of Prakash Javdekar led Climate Commitment based on most LUNATIC Assumptions guided by Extreme Dullard Sunita Narayan to seek Doubling of Coal Burning by 2030 and in doing so demanding $100b to $450b annual AID for Economies in Transition – India biggest country to benefit from it.
While USA estimated Economic Loss for Continuing With Paris Deal at $3000b annual GDP & 6.5m Lobs and $7000 household Income Loss– which is correct considering US shall be importing Finished Goods than manufacturing within, INDIA didn’t mention any ECONOMIC LOSS of DOUBLING COAL PRODUCTION, COAL POWER & EMISSIONS – COULD BE 50% of GDP. India’s Energy Expenditure is already more could be many times more than Household Expenditure.
1. India has over 200,000 MW Hydro Potential in Himalayas alone – Multi-purpose Dams could provide 800 BU of Power for say 200-500 years, Supply 500 BCM of CLEAN WATER for Irrigation, Urban Use, Flood Protection for 30 million hectares.
2. Transmission Losses exceed 23% to around 30%,
3. Irrigation Tube-wells consume 20% of Power,
4. No Efficient WOOD BURNING STOVES, FOODPROCESSING to Cut Emissions.
5. There is 30% plus Energy Efficiency opportunity. – Little Progress.
6. 200 million tons of Urban Garbage – 80% can be avoided just by DRESSING UP & PACKAGING in village itself.
7. 160m tones AVOIDED WASTE to Minimize LANDFILL DUMPING, METHANE Emissions.
8. 160m Tons of waste could be FREE FODDAR to Cattle Feed, increase Milk & Meat production.
9. 100,000 MW of Nuclear Power is Clean Option – N-Reactors PLWR have 39% Thermal Efficiency compared to 25% of PHWR – Huge advantage in Safety & Efficiency – Coastal units can produce ‘DE-SALINATED WATER’.
10.Rooftop Solar has 3 Times more ADVANTAGE than Mega Solar Parks.
11.Electric Transport – Railways – Very Little Progress.
12.Local Food Production to Minimize Transportation.
My PIL in NGT on October19, 2015 was not admitted which is attached.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kq56cg8dRuA
IMPORTANT CLIPPINGS – Full Text also attached
In 2015, the United Nations, departing top climate officials, reportedly described the $100 billion per year as “peanuts.” And stated that the $100 billion is the tail that wags the dog. In 2015, the green climate fund’s executive director reportedly stated that estimated funding needed would increase to $450 billion per year after 2020, and nobody even knows where the money is going to. Nobody’s been able to say where is it going to.
China will be allowed to build hundreds of additional coal plants. So, we can’t build the plants, but they can, according to this agreement. India will be allowed to double its coal production by 2020. Think of it. India can double their coal production. We’re supposed to get rid of ours. Even Europe is allowed to continue construction of coal plants.
In short, the agreement doesn’t eliminate coal jobs. It just transfers those jobs out of America and the United States, and ships them to foreign countries. This agreement is less about the climate and more about other countries gaining a financial advantage over the United States.
For example, under the agreement, China will be able to increase these emissions by a staggering number of years, 13. They can do whatever they want for 13 years. Not us.
India makes its participation contingent on receiving billions and billions and billions of dollars in foreign aid from developed countries. There are many other examples. But the bottom line is that the Paris Accord is very unfair at the highest level to the United States.
The cost to the economy at this time would be close to $3 trillion in lost GDP and 6.5 million industrial jobs, while households would have $7,000 less income, and in many cases, much worse than that.
Ravinder Singh, Inventor & Consultant, INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND PROJECTS
Y-77, Hauz Khas, ND -110016, India. Ph: 091- 9871056471, 9718280435, 9650421857
Ravinder Singh* is a WIPO awarded inventor specializing in Power, Transportation,
Smart Cities, Water, Energy Saving, Agriculture, Manufacturing, Technologies and Projects
Sagar Media Inc 